Trade Classification With Python

Documentation ✒️: https://karelze.github.io/tclf/

Source Code 🐍: https://github.com/KarelZe/tclf

tclf is a scikit-learn-compatible implementation of trade classification algorithms to classify financial markets transactions into buyer- and seller-initiated trades.

The key features are:

• Easy: Easy to use and learn.
• Sklearn-compatible: Compatible to the sklearn API. Use sklearn metrics and visualizations.
• Feature complete: Wide range of supported algorithms. Use the algorithms individually or stack them like LEGO blocks.

Installation

pip

pip install tclf

uv⚡

uv pip install tclf

Supported Algorithms

• (Rev.) CLNV rule¹
• (Rev.) EMO rule²
• (Rev.) LR algorithm⁶
• (Rev.) Tick test⁵
• Depth rule³
• Quote rule⁴
• Tradesize rule³

For a primer on trade classification rules visit the rules section 🆕 in our docs.

Minimal Example

Let's start simple: classify all trades by the quote rule and all other trades, which cannot be classified by the quote rule, randomly.

Create a main.py with:

main.py

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

from tclf.classical_classifier import ClassicalClassifier

X = pd.DataFrame(
    [
        [1.5, 1, 3],
        [2.5, 1, 3],
        [1.5, 3, 1],
        [2.5, 3, 1],
        [1, np.nan, 1],
        [3, np.nan, np.nan],
    ],
    columns=["trade_price", "bid_ex", "ask_ex"],
)

clf = ClassicalClassifier(layers=[("quote", "ex")], strategy="random")
clf.fit(X)
probs = clf.predict_proba(X)

Run your script with

$ python main.py

In this example, input data is available as a pd.DataFrame with columns conforming to our naming conventions.

The parameter layers=[("quote", "ex")] sets the quote rule at the exchange level and strategy="random" specifies the fallback strategy for unclassified trades.

Advanced Example

Often it is desirable to classify both on exchange level data and nbbo data. Also, data might only be available as a numpy array. So let's extend the previous example by classifying using the quote rule at exchange level, then at nbbo and all other trades randomly.

main.py

import numpy as np
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score

from tclf.classical_classifier import ClassicalClassifier

X = np.array(
    [
        [1.5, 1, 3, 2, 2.5],
        [2.5, 1, 3, 1, 3],
        [1.5, 3, 1, 1, 3],
        [2.5, 3, 1, 1, 3],
        [1, np.nan, 1, 1, 3],
        [3, np.nan, np.nan, 1, 3],
    ]
)
y_true = np.array([-1, 1, 1, -1, -1, 1])
features = ["trade_price", "bid_ex", "ask_ex", "bid_best", "ask_best"]

clf = ClassicalClassifier(
    layers=[("quote", "ex"), ("quote", "best")], strategy="random", features=features
)
clf.fit(X)
acc = accuracy_score(y_true, clf.predict(X))

In this example, input data is available as np.arrays with both exchange ("ex") and nbbo data ("best"). We set the layers parameter to layers=[("quote", "ex"), ("quote", "best")] to classify trades first on subset "ex" and remaining trades on subset "best". Additionally, we have to set ClassicalClassifier(..., features=features) to pass column information to the classifier.

Like before, column/feature names must follow our naming conventions.

Other Examples

For more practical examples, see our examples section.

Development

We are using pixi as a dependency management and workflow tool.

pixi install
pixi run postinstall
pixi run test

Citation

If you are using the package in publications, please cite as:

@software{bilz_tclf_2023,
    author = {Bilz, Markus},
    license = {BSD 3},
    month = nov,
    title = {{tclf} -- trade classification with python},
    url = {https://github.com/KarelZe/tclf},
    version = {0.0.1},
    year = {2023}
}

Footnotes

---

1. Chakrabarty, B., Li, B., Nguyen, V., & Van Ness, R. A. (2007). Trade classification algorithms for electronic communications network trades. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(12), 3806–3821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.03.003
    ↩

2. Ellis, K., Michaely, R., & O’Hara, M. (2000). The accuracy of trade classification rules: Evidence from nasdaq. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(4), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676254
    ↩

3. Grauer, C., Schuster, P., & Uhrig-Homburg, M. (2023). Option trade classification. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4098475
    ↩↩

4. Harris, L. (1989). A day-end transaction price anomaly. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330746
    ↩

5. Hasbrouck, J. (2009). Trading costs and returns for U.s. Equities: Estimating effective costs from daily data. The Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1445–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01469.x
    ↩

6. Lee, C., & Ready, M. J. (1991). Inferring trade direction from intraday data. The Journal of Finance, 46(2), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb02683.x
    ↩